• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

An estimate that arrives instantly is a warning, not a service level. A competent team responds with questions first: about integrations. A provider that quotes without asking anything is pricing a guess, and the gap becomes a change request later — on your budget.

Watch for a gap between the people you meet and the hire activemq developers actually assigned. Insist on specific people rather than roles in the statement of work, with wording covering replacement. A team that will only describe abstract roles langchain and rag difference will not commit to people is keeping the option to staff you with whoever is free.

Ask for the source repository from the first week. A team that delivers a build only at the end of each phase expects you to take delivery on faith. Visible commits show you the actual pace far better than a slide deck. The same applies to the automated test suite: if nothing runs automatically, nearshore vs offshore development quality claims are just talk.

Vague wording in the contract around code ownership is rarely a formality. The contract needs to state plainly that all outputs produced under it belong to your company on payment. Also check which is better laravel or ruby on rails country's law applies and the milestone terms: a large upfront payment with no milestone tied to it eliminates your only leverage.

Lastly, examine communication. Establish how much working-time overlap there will be each day, who answers your questions and within what time. Four hours of overlap is usually enough; no overlap stretches every clarification into a day of delay. Unclear written communication in the sales phase does not improve later.