• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A quote that comes back within a day should be treated as a bad sign. A competent team will come back with clarifying questions before any number: about who owns the data and what happens on failure. A supplier that quotes before understanding the scope is probably guessing, and a guess will be corrected later — at your expense.

Look out for a mismatch between the team in the pitch and the developers actually assigned. Request named engineers in the contract, with wording that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A provider that will only describe abstract roles and will not commit to people is keeping the option to staff you with whoever is free.

Require access to the repository from day one. A team that hands over a build only at the end of each phase expects you to trust a black box. Regular commits and php vs java spring pull requests tell you who is really on the project far better than a slide deck. This extends to the CI pipeline: if there is no pipeline, promises about quality remain nothing more than words.

Ambiguous contract language around intellectual property is not an oversight. The contract needs to state plainly that all outputs produced under it become the property of the client as they are paid for. Also check the jurisdiction and the payment schedule: a large upfront payment with nothing due in return for weeks removes any leverage you would otherwise keep.

Last, pay attention to communication. Ask what overlap the teams will share with your timezone, llm integration who is expected to answer your questions and how quickly. Some genuine overlap is normally sufficient; none at all turns a five-minute question into a twenty-four hour round trip. Sloppy written English in the proposal will not improve under delivery pressure.